About the purpose

Briefly and very simple explanation of me is like this ;I am an Intelligent design supporter and teacher from Turkiye. I hope you are not the ones  who hate ordinary people (man in pijamas) to read and think about science. As known there are two branches of the design view. The minor ID advocates accepts evolution in terms of the common ancestor..and other recent evolutionary mechanisms. I support and accept claims of the scientists like  Michael Behe, Jean Staune  and  Mike Gene ,Paul Davies, Roger Penrose. .I also agree on the view of common ancestor.This blog is not totally against Darwinism.(in terms of scientific inquiry) I believe Evolution can not be considered as the tool of the naturalist-atheistic world view or any view further. Evolution is the network of life and also seem to be totally organized and oriented by the Designer. Design is the only rational explanation of life we see on earth.

As Mike Gene stated;

”Looking at a living cell is like looking into the future of our own designs. Within the cell, the chemical processes that make life possible are under the control of coded information and sophisticated molecular machines. Could life be a true example of carbon-based nanotechnology that originated from a Mind? Could an intelligent agent possibly have designed life to exploit evolution? Could evolution and Intelligent Design be intimately linked in an elaborate dance we call life?

We can say about Neo-Darwinism tools called natural selection and mutation mechanisms could only explain adaptation and small minor changes . About big transitions like reptile to mammal, theory of Darwin is far away in explaining ”the process of evolution ”. How the molecular world evolved ? And therefore, how could the intelligent primads like us come to stage ? Darwinian answer is too nonsense to be scientifically rational : By (purely) chance or ramdomly…this means all valid observations of science are exagerated in terms of faith;atheism.

Anyone can chose to believe infinite number of possiblities as Designer mimic rahther than designer. But it is not rightous to insist, this is the only scientific approach to reach any rational thought. If all the design concepts and observed fine-tuning realities are the causes of ramdom actions of matter, then what is the secret of life and what is the answer of the big question ? Matter is capale of creating Mind ? All we talk here is the product of pure chance ? Plausible answers can just be found by rational discussions since Greeks not by overemphasing a dogma over other hypothesis.

For a Darwinian the duty is to insist all things come from ramdom hits of atoms that turn to a ” Mean” accidentally and in his ” Trench Warfare”, he is a fideist of his faith and no matter how the evidences prove design (or seem like designed) in life.The duty orders him to reject any implications totally with fully feeling of being scientific. It does not sound scientific as they always claim, as far as known , science never aims to reach static points ,and is not the tool of proof for any end terms. It endlessly seaches for the limits of human understanding. If science depends purely on atheistic world view, then a question came to mind;if this is the situation, is there any difference between science and mid-ages dogmas then ?

Personally I am here to share my readings, my personal inference about them, try to discover what is hidden or tabu in science. I hopefully want to meet scientists or interested minds to increase my knowledge about the big question what is the origin of life ? Also I want to inform people about news of intelligent design .Let us call this front loading evolution news as Mike Gene named.

Thank you for visiting…